Child custody in Thailand is a mixture of statute, family-court practice and social-work assessment — all shaped by one controlling idea: decisions must serve the child’s best interests. For parents (married or unmarried), expatriates and professionals advising families, the practical landscape is about three things: who has parental power under the Civil and Commercial Code, how the family or civil courts decide where a child will live and who makes major decisions, and what procedures exist for enforcement (including cross-border cases). Below is a detailed, practical roadmap covering legal rules, how courts evaluate cases, rights of unmarried parents, custody orders and modification, enforcement, and tips to prepare evidence that matters.
Legal framework — parental power, guardianship and the “child” definition
Thai family law treats parental authority as a bundle of rights and duties: care, upbringing, education, representation in legal acts, and management of the child’s property. The Civil and Commercial Code (parent-and-child chapters) governs parental power and guardianship. A “child” is generally anyone under 20 years of age for many custodial and maintenance purposes, and parents (or legally appointed guardians) exercise parental power unless removed by a court. Courts can appoint a guardian where both parents are deceased or incapacitated. These statutory anchors determine who can litigate for custody and who the court may consider as possible custodians.
Who gets custody by default — married vs. unmarried parents
If the parents are married, parental power is normally shared; in divorce proceedings the court will allocate physical care (where the child lives) and parental authority (decision making) in a way that best protects the child. If the parents are unmarried, Thai practice usually gives the mother day-to-day custody by default unless and until the father legitimates the child or obtains a court order establishing paternity and parental rights. Legitimation can be administrative (when the father acknowledges paternity at a district office) or, if contested, via a court proceeding requiring proof — sometimes DNA — to establish legal parenthood. Where legitimation is achieved, the father gains equal parental rights and can pursue custody or shared arrangements.
The family court process — evidence, social work reports and the “best interests” test
Child-custody disputes are usually heard in the Family or Civil Court. Judges do not apply a rigid formula; instead they weigh multiple factors to determine what arrangement serves the child’s welfare. Typical considerations include: the child’s age and gender, the emotional bond with each parent, the parents’ moral fitness and capacity to care (including history of violence, substance abuse or neglect), stability of the home environment, schooling continuity, and the child’s expressed wishes where age-appropriate. Courts frequently use social-work reports and may commission psychiatric or psychological assessments; these expert inputs carry substantial weight. Where possible, courts prefer arrangements that preserve contact with both parents while protecting the child from harm.
Physical custody vs. parental authority (decision making) — the Thai split
Thai law distinguishes possession/physical care (where the child resides and who provides daily care) from parental power (authority to make major decisions about education, travel, medical care and legal representation). A court can award physical custody to one parent while preserving parental authority for both, or allocate decision-making power to one parent (for safety or practical reasons). This split is important for disputes over relocation, passport issuance, and consent to travel: even if a parent has the child physically, they may not be able to lawfully take the child overseas without the other parent’s consent or a court order. Drafting custody agreements (or obtaining court orders) should therefore address both residence and decision rights explicitly.
Child relocation and passports — consent, court orders and risk of removal
One of the most contested issues is removal of a child from Thailand. Parents must be cautious: unilateral removal without the other parent’s consent can lead to criminal or civil consequences and complicate future custody outcomes. For international removals, Thailand is a party to the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, and central authorities and courts may cooperate in return or interim relief when Hague grounds are met. Because cross-border enforcement is complex and time sensitive, obtain either the other parent’s notarized consent or a court order permitting relocation (with clear terms about contact and return). Emergency motions to prevent removal (injunctions) are available and should be used early if removal is feared.
Child support, expenses and enforcement of custody orders
Child support and custody are related but distinct. Courts or district offices may issue maintenance orders requiring regular payments for basic needs, education and medical care — failure to pay can trigger enforcement (garnishment, contempt proceedings). If a parent with physical custody refuses contact or violates a court-ordered access regime, the other parent can apply for enforcement measures and, where appropriate, variation of custody if the child’s welfare is at risk. Keep careful records of payments and communications; digital bank records and timestamps are effective evidence.
International cases — Hague, recognition and practical reality
Thailand joined the Hague Abduction Convention in recent years, improving cross-border mechanisms for return and recognition of custody orders. Nevertheless, Hague proceedings are time-sensitive: delays in filing or in securing provisional measures can reduce the chance of a quick return. If you are an expatriate parent seeking to enforce a foreign custody order in Thailand, expect the Thai courts to examine whether the foreign order is valid and in the child’s best interests; engage local counsel and work with the central authority early. Conversely, parents in Thailand seeking return of a child abroad should involve their home-state central authority promptly.
Practical evidence that wins cases — what to prepare
Courts rely heavily on concrete, contemporaneous evidence. Useful items include:
-
Chronologies of parenting time and caregiving roles.
-
School records, medical records and vaccination history.
-
Photographs showing daily care routines and household stability.
-
Police reports or medical records if abuse or domestic violence is alleged.
-
Financial records showing ability to provide for the child and pay maintenance.
-
Witness statements from teachers, pediatricians or community figures.
Also assemble social-work or psychologist reports early if possible — they frame the child’s needs in professional terms.
Reconsideration and modification — life changes matter
Custody orders are not immutable. A parent can apply for modification if there is a material change in circumstances (relocation, job loss, substance abuse, new partner with risk factors, or the child’s matured preferences). Courts balance the child’s need for stability against the seriousness of the new facts; sudden or frequent petitions are disfavored unless the child’s welfare requires urgent change.
Practical tips — do’s and don’ts for parents and advisers
Do:
-
Try mediation first — courts favor cooperative parenting plans and mediation can preserve relationships and speed resolution.
-
Get legal advice early and preserve evidence (screenshots, bank records).
-
Obtain a clear written parenting plan that addresses residence, decision-making, schooling and holiday schedules.
-
Seek emergency injunctions if removal or immediate harm is credible.
Don’t:
-
Remove the child from Thailand without the other parent’s consent or a court order.
-
Let disputes play out solely in heated messages — courts prefer documented, sober evidence.
-
Use nominee or informal arrangements to obscure paternity or custody facts — Thai courts scrutinize authenticity.
Closing note
Child-custody law in Thailand centers on the child’s welfare, but law alone does not determine outcomes — good evidence, professional reports and sensible interim arrangements matter enormously. For international families, prompt coordination with central authorities (for Hague or other cross-border relief), early legitimation steps for unmarried fathers, and clear written agreements reduce risk. If you face a custody conflict, consult a Thai family lawyer who regularly appears in family court and can co-ordinate social-work evaluations, injunctions and, where needed, cross-border enforcement.